Abstract
Tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis has remained a major global health problem worldwide. TB requires prolonged period of time for isolation by conventional culture methods. The emergence and spread of multi drug resistant (MDR-TB) poses great threats and challenges in controlling the infection. MDR-TB is resistant to both first line drugs rifampicin and isoniazid. PCR tests are based on targeting the mutation in rpoB, katG and inhA genes which can detect resistance to these drugs. To compare microscopy, conventional culture and Line probe assay for the detection of M. tuberculosis & detect rifampicin and isoniazid resistance using Lineprobe assay in various clinical samples. A total of 347 suspected patients of tuberculosis were included in the study. Demographic details & clinical presentation was noted. Various samples were received & processed for ZN staining, culture on LJ media and Line probe assay. Out of 347 cases, majority of cases were in the age group of 51-60 years (18.4%). Majority of the population was males (65.1%). Among suspected tuberculosis patients, cough with expectoration (55.9%) was the commonest complaint. Microscopy was positive in 17.3%, conventional culture was positive in 16.1% and line probe assay was positive in 26.2%. Out of 347, 91 were diagnosed with MTB, out of which 85.7% were sensitive to both rifampicin and isoniazid whereas 14.3% showed resistance to either rifampicin / isoniazid or both. LPA & direct microscopy are a good screening method for early diagnosis and detection of drug resistance but are not a complete replacement of conventional culture which is still a gold standard.
References
Chang B, Wu AW, Hansel NN, Diette GB. Review Quality of life in tuberculosis: a review of the English language literature. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13:1633-42.
World Health Organization. Tuberculosis control in the south-east Asia region annual TB report 2015; New Delhi: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia; 2014.
Asselineau C, Asselineau J, Laneelle G, Laneelle MA. The biosynthesis of mycolic acids by mycobacteria: current and alternative hypotheses. Prog Lipid Res. 2002; 41:501-23.
Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response. Available from: WHO/HTM/TB/2010.3. Last Accessed on Nov 15, 2018.
Forbes BA, Sahm DF, Weissfeld AS. Mycobacteria. In: Bailey & Scott’s Diagnostic Microbiology. 12th edition. Mosby Elsevier: China; 2007. p. 478-508.
Annual Status Report, TB INDIA 2014, Revised National TB Control Programme, Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2014, New Delhi. Available from: http://www.tbcindia.nic.in/ showfile.php?lid=3142, accessed on December 17, 2014
Walt B, Rayner A, Harris G. Mycobacterium. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, BP Marmion, A Simmons, eds. Mackie & McCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. 14th edition Churchill Livingstone. India; 2007, p. 329-40.
Revised National TB Control Programme Manual of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug susceptibility testing on solid medium; 2009. p. 31-4.
Borgdorff MW, Nagelkerke NJD, Haas PEWD, Soolingen DV. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis depending on the age and sex of source cases. Am J Epidemiol. 2001; 154:934-43.
Sanneh AFNS, Pollock JI. Comparison of Pulmonary TB DOTS clinic medication before and after the introduction of daily DOTS treatment and attitudes of treatment defaulters in the Western Division of the Gambia. African Health Sci. 2010; 10:165-71.
Baboolal S, Millet J, Akpaka PE, Ramoutar D, Rastogi N. First insight into Mycobacterium tuberculosis epidemiology and genetic diversity in Trinidad and Tobago. J Clin Microbiol. 2009; 47:1911-4.
Salam AA, Rehman S, Munir MK, Iqbal R, Saeed S, Khan S. Importance of ziehl-neelsen smear and culture on lowenstein jensen medium in diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Pakistan Medical Research Council TB Research Centre. 2014:1-4.
Sharma J, Joshi S, Vaidya S. Comparative analysis of line probe assay and conventional method of drug susceptibility testing for the diagnosis of multidrug resistant tuberculosis. International Journal of Applied Research. 2016; 2:849-53.
Yadav RN, Singh BK, Sharma SK, Sharma R, Soneja M, Sreenivas V, et al. Comparative evaluation of GenoType MTBDRplus line probe assay with solid culture method in early diagnosis of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) at a tertiary care centre in India. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72036. 170. Raveendran R, Wattal C, Oberoi JK, Goel N, Datta S, Prasad KJ, et al. Utility of genoType MTBDRplus assay in rapid diagnosis of multidrug resistant tuberculosis at a tertiary care centre in India. Indian J Med Microbiol 2012; 30:58-63.
Singhal R, Arora J, Sah GC, Bhalla M, Sarin R, Prasad Myneedu V. Frequency of multi-drug resistance and mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Punjab state of India. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017; 7:175-180.
Goyal S, Malhotra B, Bhargava S. Detection of multi-drugresistance in extra pulmonary tuberculosis by indirect GenoType MTBDRplus line probe assay. RUHS Journal of Health Sciences. 2016; 1:13-19.
How to cite this article:
Malhotra P, Chhina D, Gupta V, Singh A and Sandhu D. Role of line probe assay in diagnosis and detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. L. Sci. 2019; 8(2): 46-49. doi: 10.13040/IJRDPL.2278-0238.8(2).46-49
This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Array